Before I say anything, I simply need to say that the Utah Utes are my school football public bosses for the 2008 season. Why? Since school football is caught in an old fashioned custom in which the public hero is chosen by a survey consistently. In the event that the AP citizens get to pick their public hero, for what reason might I at any point pick mine?
What we as a whole know, however, is that the postseason of school football is extremely past due for a change. Indeed, a few years, as in 2002, the BCS was useful. Be that as it may, in different years, as 2008, the BCS was a finished wreck. Why? Since it is intrinsically defective. The BCS is intended to match the two best groups from the normal season in a title game. That is okay when in 2002 Ohio State and Miami(FL) were the main undefeated groups.
In any case, what might be said about this year? Utah and Boise state completed the customary season undefeated. Oklahoma, Texas, Texas Tech, USC, Florida, Alabama and Penn Express undeniably wrapped up with one misfortune. How on earth might the BCS at any point profess to “know” which of those groups are the two best? All of them put forth a decent defense to be given thought.
So with the prospect of a school football season finisher not in that frame of mind of the BCS, how can be fixed this wreck? The response is an in addition to one organization.
Presently, the BCS matches the two best groups toward the finish of the normal season. An in addition to one organization thinks about the bowl season prior to concluding who the two best groups in the country are. Envision this year assuming the dishes had been Florida beating Texas, Oklahoma squeaking past Ohio State and Utah destroying Alabama? Couldn’t the bowl prepare have presented the defense for Utah to play Florida in the title game? Envision a public title where the two groups accomplished something other than win the apparent “best” gatherings in school football?
So here is a postseason proposition for school football that can really work. To begin with, add a fifth bowl to the BCS bowls. The Cotton Bowl appears to be a conspicuous decision. Then, at that point, make a customary contention between meeting champions. The accompanying could work:
Rose Bowl: Pac 10 versus Huge 10
Party Bowl: Huge 12 versus WAC
Sugar Bowl: SEC versus MWC
Orange Bowl: ACC versus Huge East
Cotton Bowl: C-USA, Sun Belt, Macintosh
The two higher positioned groups between C-USA, Sun Belt and Macintosh can play in the Cotton Bowl. Notre Lady gets in the Cotton Bowl assuming they are positioned #8 or higher and are additionally positioned higher than something like two of those meeting champions.
Presently these dishes will be generally played in two days to bring back some New Year’s custom. Two dishes are played on December 31 and different three on January 1. Change likewise in the event that one of those falls on a Sunday. Make these BCS bowls the last dishes played of the time. When all bowls have been played, including these BCS bowls, then the BCS reranks the groups.
The in addition to one arrangement would require the new number one and number two to play each other in the public title game. Is it great? No, on the grounds that there will constantly be discussion. However, does anybody at any point check out a bowl game their group isn’t playing ready? This would bring the significance of the school football standard season into the bowl season. Losing a bowl game would be something other than a mistake like it is presently; it could wreck your public title yearnings.
Conclusion
A season finisher is the main genuine method for wiping out debate in this game, yet we as a whole know the BCS and the people pulling the strings won’t permit that to happen at any point in the near future. That is, obviously, except if Obama and the public authority intercede and stop the unjustifiable acts of the BCS. However, i wouldn’t pause your breathing. Until a season finisher can turn into a reality, this in addition to one proposition would be all that we could get.